INCLUDE_DATA

2010 Video Commerce Summit Recap

I’ve just returned from the 2010 Video Commerce Summit hosted by my company, Liveclicker. This is the second time the summit was held in Seattle, WA.  In all, the summit was 2X the size of last year’s with 75 onsite attendees from many of the top e-commerce sites including Amazon.com, Bed Bath & Beyond, Zappos, Microsoft, Costco, Nordstrom, REI, Overstock.com, and over 20 others.  REELSEO was onsite for videography.  Throughout this week we’ll see interviews on REELSEO.com highlighting learnings from the speakers and attendees.

Jimmy Healey from Onlineshoes.com addresses the audience during his presentation, “The Marriage of Online Video and Social Media”

I’m still digesting all of the information from the summit so beware the below thoughts are somewhat stream of consciousness as I reflect on the state of the video commerce industry.

  • The manner in which retailers are using video varies widely today, however most e-commerce sites seem to be concerned mainly with product videos.  It wasn’t universal, but the focus on product video was unmistakable.
  • Scaling video in e-commerce is a hotter topic than ever before, and it seems clear no one method of scaling is poised to dominate.  Automated video (e.g. SundaySky, Treepodia, DynamicVideo, Stupeflix) is preferred by Overstock.com (which uses SundaySky), but other retailers like REI choose to use a system like TalkMarket which automates much of the traditional filming process without creating artificial/computer-generated looking slideshow content.  Still other retailers are scaling through user generated video: Beautychoice.com scales through its YouTube “Beauty Stars” program while drugstore.com is using ExpoTV’s new integration with Liveclicker’s Video Exchange Marketplace to broaden access to user generated videos.  Zappos, which initially began using TalkMarket, has chosen to instead hone its own in-house production process to make video scale as they race toward producing 60,000 videos in 2010.
  • I’m more convinced than ever before there is a direct response TV play for many retailers, especially lifestyle brands.  The reason is simple: TV offers reach.  Reach is the #1 problem faced by retailers today in their video programs.  It’s not about the number of videos, but rather making sure the investments in video are targeted enough that they reach a wide audience and focus on hot products that generate lots of revenue (HSN model, which btw is total opposite of the auto-video model in my view).  I’m unsure whether my view is shared by many retailers, but seeing HSN’s stats for the lifetime value of their multichannel shoppers for TV and web (~$1,250) is nearly twice the value of the shoppers that are only on TV or only on the web looks like a major opportunity for most traditional “web only” e-commerce sites.   Plus, smaller retailers like PFI have been able to make TV work with close to “zero” budget, funding efforts through vendor co-op programs.  Still, the lack of video as a core competency for most retailers, plus the inability of most retailers to make a sizable direct response TV play without direct CEO level support will probably hold most back for now although I do expect to see a couple of interesting announcements over the coming 12 months that are likely to propel the industry in this direction and further blur the distinction between TV direct sales and traditional e-commerce.
  • Video SEO continues on as a hot topic in online retail.  This is the subject of a multi-part blog post, but suffice it to say many retailers see a big part of the immediate video opportunity comes in the form of better SEO.
  • Guided video shopping is poised to become an emerging trend in the second half of this year entering into the busy Q4 season.  We’ll likely see several interesting cases from top retailers that are working to bring interactive video to the next level during the upcoming holiday.
  • We held a ‘future of video’ panel with Dan Greenberg (Founder/CEO Sharethrough), Xavier Casanova (Founder/CEO Liveclicker), Yaniv Axen (Founder/CTO SundaySky) and Mark Robertson (Founder/Publisher REELSEO).  Some of the views held in common by the panelists included a) each person sees a rich future in automated, personalized video, although it wasn’t clear what form that would ultimately take b) successful video platforms will take open approaches while providing the right amount of rich functionality to appease the partner ecosystem while remaining highly competitive in the core product c) there is going to continue to be a blurring between brand and direct marketing with video, but the two worlds are still far apart.  It’s clear though that video is blurring the worlds of branding and e-commerce in new ways that are likely to have significant impact on the ways we shop and interact with brands.
  • This video commerce industry feels like the e-commerce industry felt in 1998.  The future is bright for all of us in video commerce.  We’re still in the top half of the first inning in an exciting baseball game.  Until next time… Happy Selling!
View from the Video Commerce Summit Private Suite at Safeco Field at the 2010 Video Commerce Summit.
View From left: Justin Foster (Liveclicker), Bill Hildebolt (ExpoTV), BJ Fogg (Stanford), Denny Bills listen in on the panel, “Social Video: The Next Wave of Video Commerce?” with Dan Greenberg (Sharethrough), Andy Chen (PowerReviews), Jimmy Healey (Onlineshoes.com), Jordan Blum (BeautyChoice).
Stanford University’s Persuasive Technology Lab Director BJ Fogg delivers his keynote address, “Placing Persuasive Video on the Path to Purchase.”
Summit attendees listen intently as HSN’s Emery Skolfield presents “How HSN Maintains its Video Commerce Leadership.”

6 Responses

  1. Mike Darnell Says:

    Hey there,

    Thanks for mentioning us in this post. Scaling is indeed one of the biggest issues facing video for ecommerce. I’m very interested in hearing how scale is coupled with a/b testing in the other methods you listed.

    It would appear that at least in this respect fully automated video should have an advantage as there is little or no cost in creating & testing multiple versions for every video.

    Mike
    @treepodia

  2. Justin Foster Says:

    Hi Mike,

    I think in this industry we too often compare methods of production as if they were competitors to one another when in fact each method of production has its place. It is best to take a holistic view.

    For example, you won’t see a video-centric retailer like QVC/HSN/ShopNBC porting automated video to air (or even on their most important products on their sites) any more than you would see Overstock.com or one of Treepodia’s many clients investing millions of dollars in producing feature-film quality video for low-selling, low-margin products.

    Automated video -in its current state – is a valuable tool in the online retailer’s toolkit, but in my opinion and my opinion alone, it’s a far cry from a paradigm-shifting, ground-changing breakthrough technology. There are simply too many variables at play that automated video is unable to address: production quality, flexibility in presentation at the product level, scalable voice compilation, personality, trust-building, reputation, etc.

    I don’t mean to dismiss automated video by any means in case you misinterpret this reply. Our panel unanimously agreed that both automation and personalization in video production would be important to the future of video commerce. Some of the advantages you mention, such as the ability to dynamically swap presentation order of items featured in-video and test versions will become even more important as technology evolves. Still, e-commerce merchants need to remain wary of the reliability of any “winner picking” technology that is unable to reliably predict a winner, as is the case with many long tail products on an e-commerce site where there are few video views. Again, in my opinion, this is where automated video does best – with long tail products. So the value of any winner picking is going to be limited (not useless) unless the technology is used on products with many video views. Even in those cases, I really am not convinced that the presentation automation is ideal beyond simply informing “better quality” video production. At least for now.

    Lest you think this is a biased response to your post, I can assure you it is not. We are already working with automated video technologies and see a lot of potential in the production method. But for today, it’s really not a game-changer. Again, only IMO.

    Justin

  3. twive! Says:

    Video Commerce Summit 2010: Die US-Trends im Überblick…

    Nach der Premierenveranstaltung im Vorjahr hat vergangene Woche in Seattle erneut der Video Commerce Summit von Liveclicker stattgefunden. Die zentralen Erkenntnisse vom US-Branchen-Treff hat Mitveranstalter Justin Foster nun nebenan beim Video Commerc…

  4. Yaniv Axen @ SundaySky Says:

    Justin, great job in arranging this very interesting event! The crowd was great and the panels were well organized. I already can’t wait to next year’s summit.

  5. The Growth and Future of Video in E-Commerce: Creativity Vs Psychology Says:

    [...] again to them for our coverage and be sure to check them out.) Justin is also the founder of the Video Commerce Consortium, where you can read the recap of the Summit and the entire day of panels.  Justin is also a [...]

  6. video online empresas, e-commerce empresas, video online e-commerce, captacion de atencion video, estrategia online de videos, video online marketing, video empresa producto, psicologia video online, comportamiento usuario video online, social video, svm, Says:

    [...] entrevista a Justin Foster, co-Founder y VP de Market Development para Liveclicker, y fundador del Video Commerce Consortium, se pudieron sacar varias conclusiones sobre el estado del video online para e-commerce, visión de [...]

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.